<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 Beautiful CSS-Based Web-Designs in 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewebdesignblog.com/2006/12/20/50-beautiful-css-based-web-designs-in-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewebdesignblog.com/2006/12/20/50-beautiful-css-based-web-designs-in-2006/</link>
	<description>Providing designers daily with tutorials, articles, tips, tricks, and other goodies</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roy Tomeij</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebdesignblog.com/2006/12/20/50-beautiful-css-based-web-designs-in-2006/#comment-4158</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Tomeij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 08:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebdesignblog.com/2006/12/20/50-beautiful-css-based-web-designs-in-2006/#comment-4158</guid>
		<description>And pretty much like I said their, too bad a fair amount of those features sites are build upon semantically incorrect HTML or even table based lay-outs.

Sure, it has no font-tags and it validates, but does that make it okay if it's inaccessible and poor coded? Just call it "50 Beautiful Graphic Designs" then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And pretty much like I said their, too bad a fair amount of those features sites are build upon semantically incorrect HTML or even table based lay-outs.</p>
<p>Sure, it has no font-tags and it validates, but does that make it okay if it&#8217;s inaccessible and poor coded? Just call it &#8220;50 Beautiful Graphic Designs&#8221; then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
